“What we heard” live insights are noisy and low quality

insights section, the generated insights are low quality and feel raw and incomplete. They often show fragments of user quotes or very surface‑level points. I expected a cleaned‑up, curated summary of the key themes and insights.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Complete an interview session.

2. Navigate to the “What we heard” or live insights section for that session.

3. Review the list of insights produced.

4. Compare them with what was actually discussed in the interview.

Actual vs Expected Behavior

Actual:

• Insights are sometimes just verbatim fragments like “Yeah. I don’t know.”

• Important themes and pain points are missing or underrepresented.

• The section feels noisy and unpolished.
  Expected:

• Coherent, readable statements that summarize what the user said in context.

• Coverage of the main themes, pain points, and needs discussed in the interview.

• Minimal redundancy and avoidance of trivial or unhelpful fragments.

Additional Context (optional)

Example from the provided session: “Yeah. I don’t know. I mean, there was no real training.” is surfaced as‑is, which isn’t a very useful insight.